PDF / Epub ☉ How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind Author Paul Erickson – Fanfaremedia.co.uk



10 thoughts on “How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind

  1. says:

    A brilliant ensemble cast intellectual history of the debates over how to define rationality during the cold war, a debate that began in the pressure cooker of WWII operations research, achieved a chain reaction at RAND in the first postwar decade, mushroomed in economics via game theory, and then delivered its fallout across the social sciences which the authors insist on calling the human sciences , and most particularly in psychology The central argument of the book is that what the ratio A brilliant ensemble cast intellectual history of the debates over how to define rationality during the cold war, a debate that began in the pressure cooker of WWII operations research, achieved a chain reaction at RAND in the first postwar decade, mushroomed in economics via game theory, and then delivered its fallout across the social sciences which the authors insist on calling the human sciences , and most particularly in psychology The central argument of the book is that what the rationality theorists did was to strip away from the much broader and older Enlightenment concept of reason as many elements as possible such as judgment, taste, fairness, understanding, imagination, etc to produce a powerfully reductive formal concept of rationality that was independent of personality or context, and that was therefore amenable to algorithmic expression through a series of simple, unambiguous, sequential steps that could be reproduced mechanically in particular in the new digital computers that were just beginning to become available In particular, the concept of the universally transitively consistent preference maximizing homo economicus became THE ideal of what rationality was supposed to mean.But the deep revelation of the book is that the very effort to create such a powerfully simple concept of reason repeatedly ran up against and indeed revealed the limits of reason as actually practiced by actually existing humans, particularly with respect to the highest stakes question of the time, namely the strategic nuclear rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union Herbert Simon, for example, realized that maximization was not always an ahem reasonable objective, since the computing power required to resolve the most complex algorithms was not readily available Reaching good enough minimum thresholds what Simon called satisficing was often aappropriate objective for many categories of problem.Part of the subtle cheekiness of the book, which was written collectively the authors claim they used a algorithm to assign chapter authorships randomly and with surprising style and wit, is that it insists on using a method that is, paying close ethnographic attention to the social and institutional contexts, the shared sociabilities, for the production of these Cold War ideas about rationality which is directly at odds with the definition of rationality as calculation that their subjects were trying to distill Yet at the same time, the authors deeply appreciate the ways in which the men they write about and they were almost all men used their powerful set of ideas to gain purchase on the most pressing problems of their era, and to use that purchase to gain access to the highest corridors of power in Washington.The only significant flaw of the book is that while it nods briefly to the absence of similar sorts of debates in the Soviet Union they note that there was some Soviet work in cybernetics, but they hypothesize, somewhat limply, that Marxist dialectical materialism prevented the methodological innovations that the Americans were undertaking , it does not do nearly enough to account for how and why Cold War rationality was a peculiarly American phenomenon After all it wasn t just Soviet and Chinese Communists who didn t play the Cold War rationality game neither did intellectuals in Britain, France, or Germany


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind download How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind , read online How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind , kindle ebook How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind , How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind 592d8ce321e6 In The United States At The Height Of The Cold War, Roughly Between The End Of World War II And The Early S, A New Project Of Redefining Rationality Commanded The Attention Of Sharp Minds, Powerful Politicians, Wealthy Foundations, And Top Military Brass Its Home Was The Human Sciences Psychology, Sociology, Political Science, And Economics, Among Others And Its Participants Enlisted In An Intellectual Campaign To Figure Out What Rationality Should Mean And How It Could Be Deployed How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind Brings To Life The People Herbert Simon, Oskar Morgenstern, Herman Kahn, Anatol Rapoport, Thomas Schelling, And Many Others And Places, Including The RAND Corporation, The Center For Advanced Study In The Behavioral Sciences, The Cowles Commission For Research And Economics, And The Council On Foreign Relations, That Played A Key Role In Putting Forth A Cold War Rationality Decision Makers Harnessed This Picture Of Rationality Optimizing, Formal, Algorithmic, And Mechanical In Their Quest To Understand Phenomena As Diverse As Economic Transactions, Biological Evolution, Political Elections, International Relations, And Military Strategy The Authors Chronicle And Illuminate What It Meant To Be Rational In The Age Of Nuclear Brinkmanship